We all know that our manuscripts must please a publisher. If an agent is queried first, the manuscript has to please the agent and the publisher. Since the ultimate goal is to please the publisher, do you think it's smart to research a publisher's bookshelf and write a book to target their tastes?
As I complete a manuscript, and revise it a zillion times, I come to realize what the book is about. Does my story teach a lesson? If so, what type of lesson? Is my story just a fun-loving, good time kind of story? Does my story feature funny topics that children laugh at, such as body functions (peeing, pooping, etc..)? Once I know these answers, I try to find publishers that handle books that are similar to mine.
But... what if the process were reversed? What if I researched a publisher first, then wrote a story I believed they would take on? Is that... bad?
Don't get me wrong, I'd never write a book I didn't enjoy writing. But, there are times when I feel like I should write to a publishers liking and maybe I'll have an even better chance of getting published. Once I can get published, maybe I can have more flexibility to publish other things I have written. It seems as though debut writers have to walk the tight rope until they are published.
So, what do you think? Is it bad to write a story to just target a specific publisher?
Jun 23, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment